Skip to main content

Arizona's Autism Insurance Law (Steven's Law)

There is a bill wending its way through the State Legislator that requires insurance companies to cover services for autism. It's called Steven's Law or HB2847 and SB1263 (you can look them up on Basically it covers diagnosis, speech therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and behavior therapy (ABA).

When I first heard of this bill, I was a bit skeptical. Maybe that sounds odd since three of my four children have an autism diagnosis, but I'm not a fan of regulation. At first glance it seemed to be aimed at forcing insurance to cover whatever fad-of-the-week treatment somebody wanted to use. That just didn't seem like a very good idea. However, after doing some research on and actually reading the proposed legislation, I became convinced that, sadly, this is indeed necessary.

One of my main fears was that the bill might require insurance to cover any "treatment" without regard to how effective it actually is. However, the bill specifically lays out what is covered and only gives wiggle room for behavioral therapy - in that behavioral therapy will only include "evidence based" therapies such as ABA. This means that if you don't have a scientifically accepted behavioral therapy, your insurance is not required to cover it.

So why to I agree with the bill? First of all, the bill only requires insurance to cover what they should already be covering anyway. Autism is treatable. If caught early enough and treated effectively, a child with autism has a very good chance of living a normal life. It is a health issue just like cancer or chicken pox. We expect insurance to cover our necessary medical expenses and for those affected by autism, treatment is a necessary medical expense.

Second, as I have previously stated, they bill doesn't go too far. It's not covering any treatment you can come up with. It only covers those treatments that have been scientifically shown to help those affected by autism.

Third, it includes Asperger's Syndrome and PDD NOS under the umbrella of autism. Both of these classifications are similar to autism and can be helped by the same treatment but, because they aren't specifically autism, they usually don't get the coverage they need (either from insurance or from State services). I think it's about time these were brought into the autism spectrum so that those affected can get the treatment they need.

I think the only real downside of this bill is that it is necessary at all. Insurance should already be covering the things mandated in this bill. I guess the insurance companies figured that if a child with autism never becomes functional, it's the State that will foot the bill for lifetime care and not them. OK, perhaps (and hopefully) I'm being overly cynical, but it still comes back to this bill only requires what insurance should already be covering.

I support this bill and, if you live in Arizona, I would encourage you to contact your State Legislators and encourage them to vote in favor of it.


Popular posts from this blog

Insteon: Controller vs Responder

This entry is going to be more of a technical article.  If you're not planning on setting up scenes in an Insteon environment, this isn't for you.  If you are or like me, have been running into some confusion about what should be set up as a controller, what should be a responder, and what should be both.  Here's what I learned.

I've been using Insteon switches for a couple of years now and had set up a few scenes.  When adding a switch to a scene, you have the option of adding it as a controller, a responder, or both.  Not knowing the difference and wanting to cover my bases, I set all of my scenes to both.  Since my scenes were all timing type scenes (e.g. turn on night lights at sunset) it worked fine.  Then I added an 8 button keypad and started programming the buttons to control other lights.  The program for this, of course, is a scene.  Once again, I set every switch and button as both a controller and a responder.  Then I created a scene, specifically for my E…


I just finished reading The Agony and the Ecstasy by Irving Stone. It's a biographical novel of Michelangelo (you know, the famous sculptor/artist whose statue of David and the paintings in the Cistine Chapel are super famous) that gives a very interesting view of his life. It seems that while Michelangelo had a very productive life, it wasn't a very happy one.

One of the first things that I noticed about Stone's portrayel of Michelangelo is that he was obsessed with creating sculptures and a true perfectionist. For a large portion of his life (into his 60s it seems) his every action was calculated toward a goal of sculpting marble - either getting a commission or improving his talent (or both). Not only did he want to sculpt, he wanted his pieces to be as real as possible.

His obsession with carving perfect sculptures drove him to do endless studies of the human form. He even spent months sneaking into a morgue to dissect bodies so he could figure out how the body real…

Sonos Control with the Amazon Echo - How I did it

I've had my Amazon Echo for a year or so and one thing that I've wanted ever since I purchased it, is to be able to use voice commands to control my Sonos speakers.  I waited patiently (OK  not patiently) for Sonos skill to appear on the Echo but it still hasn't come.  I was encouraged when Sonos announced it was going to focus more on voice but still nothing.  Isn't there any way to control my Sonos with my Echo?

Yes - sort of.

WARNING: This post is not for the faint of heart because the solution is not trivial.

So, I found a project on github that uses another project on github combined with a custom skill on
the Echo via a web service hosted by AWS Lambda.  OK, that was the easy part.  I knew that going in.  That's why, initially, I waited.  There must be an elegant solution out there.  I searched and waited and searched again and waited again.  Finally I decided to give it a try.  If it worked it would be really cool.  If it didn't, well I'm no worse o…