Skip to main content

Democrats, Oil Prices, and the Environment

The Democrats have a bit of a problem right now.  Gas prices are shooting through the roof and they want to say they're doing something about it.  Their plan is a windfall tax on oil companies.  This tax (which the Republicans blocked so it probably won't happen anytime soon - if it happens at all) is kind of a "feel good" tax.  Why?  Because it punishes the oil companies for making too much money but it doesn't help the consumer at all.  Think about it, will gas prices drop because oil companies may have to pay more taxes?  I don't think so.  So it's a tax that makes "the masses" happy because our benevolent government is sticking it to "big oil" but doesn't really help the consumer at all.

So who does it help?  It helps the government by giving them more revenue and it also helps the environment because a way to avoid the tax is to invest in alternative energy.  Hmmm... the environment.  Coincidentally, there are a large number of Democrats who believe that burning oil in all of its forms, as well as other fossil fuels, is killing the environment.  Their solution is to find alternative forms of energy and to stop any expansion of current oil and gas drilling operations.  While they have been successful at blocking the expansion of drilling and making it nearly impossible to build new refineries, they haven't been able to do much for alternative energy beyond a few tax credits.  So what's happened is they've increased our dependence on foriegn oil by not allowing us to drill for our own oil.  This dependence also puts us at the mercy of the world oil market and any price fluctuations that happen there.  However, that's not all bad because what many of them long for is to have oil prices high enough that alternative energy is economically feasible.  I have heard many a Democrat wishing that the government would raise gas taxes so that gas prices would go up.  This would encourage people to conserve and/or use alternatives.

Well they got their wish.  Oil and gas prices are skyrocketing and so, by comparison, alternatives are becoming better values.  Unfortunately, the people who are the hardest hit by these high prices don't have the luxury of converting to alternative energy.  They can't just sell their truck for a hybrid - they don't have that kind of money.  They are struggling to make ends meet and the cost of fuel is killing them.  What's worse is that a huge number of these people are Democrats.  Uh oh!

So what do you do?  Why you blame it on Republicans, of course.  It's easy.  The current President is a Republican and he's only slightly more liked than a bout of malaria (and yet he still gets higher ratings than the Democrat controlled congress - go figure).  So it's the President and the Republicans.  They've engineered this gas crunch to line their own pockets.  They are pure evil!

The truth, however, is much more complex.  There are so many factors that it would be naive to assume that only one set of actions is responsible for the current crisis.  Some blame the war in Iraq and OPEC for the high prices but OPEC is saying that they are meeting demand just fine and have no need to increase production.  So is it Iraq?  Well, if plenty of oil is being produced with out it, maybe Iraq isn't the problem either.  What about market speculation?  What about a shortage of refineries?  What about the strategic oil reserve?  What about world competition?  What about our restrictions on drilling?  What about US consumers' unwillingness to conserve?  I'm sure there are a thousand more "what about" questions that can be asked.  I think the truth is that there's enough responsibility to go around.

The environmentalists, which are mostly Democrats, have been working for years to regulate into extinction the production of fossil fuels.  They have many people who believe their rhetoric and support their proposed policies.  However, making fossil fuels harder to get to makes them more expensive and contributes to our current problem.  Personally, I think it's ironic that these same people who have really pushed to raise oil prices are the same ones that want to punish the oil companies because prices have gone up.

This isn't to say that the Republicans are innocent here.  The war in Iraq has had a destabilizing effect on the middle east which has spurred speculation and is also partly responsible for high oil prices.

However, it's the Democrats who are in a bit of a bind.  They have to figure out how to deal with an issue that they helped create and that many of them think is a good thing.  What's worse, is they have to find a plan of action that doesn't endorse high gas prices (which punishes their working class constituents) but doesn't hurt the environment (which angers the environmentalists).  So far the best they've come up with is to try to punish oil companies for having the audacity to actually make a profit.


Popular posts from this blog

Insteon: Controller vs Responder

This entry is going to be more of a technical article.  If you're not planning on setting up scenes in an Insteon environment, this isn't for you.  If you are or like me, have been running into some confusion about what should be set up as a controller, what should be a responder, and what should be both.  Here's what I learned.

I've been using Insteon switches for a couple of years now and had set up a few scenes.  When adding a switch to a scene, you have the option of adding it as a controller, a responder, or both.  Not knowing the difference and wanting to cover my bases, I set all of my scenes to both.  Since my scenes were all timing type scenes (e.g. turn on night lights at sunset) it worked fine.  Then I added an 8 button keypad and started programming the buttons to control other lights.  The program for this, of course, is a scene.  Once again, I set every switch and button as both a controller and a responder.  Then I created a scene, specifically for my E…


I just finished reading The Agony and the Ecstasy by Irving Stone. It's a biographical novel of Michelangelo (you know, the famous sculptor/artist whose statue of David and the paintings in the Cistine Chapel are super famous) that gives a very interesting view of his life. It seems that while Michelangelo had a very productive life, it wasn't a very happy one.

One of the first things that I noticed about Stone's portrayel of Michelangelo is that he was obsessed with creating sculptures and a true perfectionist. For a large portion of his life (into his 60s it seems) his every action was calculated toward a goal of sculpting marble - either getting a commission or improving his talent (or both). Not only did he want to sculpt, he wanted his pieces to be as real as possible.

His obsession with carving perfect sculptures drove him to do endless studies of the human form. He even spent months sneaking into a morgue to dissect bodies so he could figure out how the body real…

Sonos Control with the Amazon Echo - How I did it

I've had my Amazon Echo for a year or so and one thing that I've wanted ever since I purchased it, is to be able to use voice commands to control my Sonos speakers.  I waited patiently (OK  not patiently) for Sonos skill to appear on the Echo but it still hasn't come.  I was encouraged when Sonos announced it was going to focus more on voice but still nothing.  Isn't there any way to control my Sonos with my Echo?

Yes - sort of.

WARNING: This post is not for the faint of heart because the solution is not trivial.

So, I found a project on github that uses another project on github combined with a custom skill on
the Echo via a web service hosted by AWS Lambda.  OK, that was the easy part.  I knew that going in.  That's why, initially, I waited.  There must be an elegant solution out there.  I searched and waited and searched again and waited again.  Finally I decided to give it a try.  If it worked it would be really cool.  If it didn't, well I'm no worse o…