Skip to main content

Who Can We Trust: Business or Government?

I was reading an article today that asked how much freedom we're willing to trade for Google convenience.  That, in and of itself wasn't a big deal (although and interesting question), however, in the comments a poster made a very interesting observation:

This idea that government is benevolent and business inherently evil is one of the most destructively successful pieces of government propaganda in recent history.

Well that made me stop and think.

So, is the poster correct?  Let's look at politics.  What are some of the "evils" we hear about a lot in campaigns and from our elected representatives?  How about "Big Oil", "Big Healthcare", "Big Insurance", etc.  The assumption seems to be that any large company and/or industry is inherently evil.  And who will protect us from those huge, evil companies?  Why our benevolent, helpful government of course!

This is the liberal slant you usually hear from the left.  It doesn't help that there's plenty of anecdotal evidence to illustrate their case.  So are they right?

The conservatives, on the other hand, will talk about government waste, inefficiencies, bad policies (usually blamed on left-leaning politicians), and sometimes even talk about "Big Government" but it's always with the "vote for me and I'll make it good again" line.  So, are they right?

My opinion is this:  Neither business nor government is inherently good or evil.  Their actions are merely reflections of the people running them.  Both institutions want to succeed/protect their territory.  Businesses compete with other businesses, sue for patent infringement, and will try almost anything (where they draw the line is once again determined by the folks running the business) to get ahead and stay ahead.  This may lead to layoffs, outsourcing, cutting corners, and all those things that people hate about "Big Business".  It may also lead to raises, increased hiring, innovations that benefit us, and all those things we love about our standard of living.

Government is actually quite similar to business.  Certain departments seem to stop at nothing to get what they want, whether it's questionable tactics used in going after terrorists, the IRS going after suspected tax evaders, etc.  Others seem more interested in red tape than actually helping, whether it's Unemployment, the DMV, Social Security, etc.  At the same time our government fights wars (whether that's good or bad depends on the person), builds roads, protects the people (military, police, firefighters, etc.), regulates businesses, etc.

I guess, at the end of the day, I have to say that there are no absolutes.  Both business and government have their positive and negative aspects.  Our job is to watch them and, if they get out of line, take the necessary steps to fix the problem (stop buying their products, elect new representatives, petition, etc.)  We have great freedoms and more power most people think, but with that comes a lot of responsibility.  Let's all do our part.


Popular posts from this blog

Insteon: Controller vs Responder

This entry is going to be more of a technical article.  If you're not planning on setting up scenes in an Insteon environment, this isn't for you.  If you are or like me, have been running into some confusion about what should be set up as a controller, what should be a responder, and what should be both.  Here's what I learned.

I've been using Insteon switches for a couple of years now and had set up a few scenes.  When adding a switch to a scene, you have the option of adding it as a controller, a responder, or both.  Not knowing the difference and wanting to cover my bases, I set all of my scenes to both.  Since my scenes were all timing type scenes (e.g. turn on night lights at sunset) it worked fine.  Then I added an 8 button keypad and started programming the buttons to control other lights.  The program for this, of course, is a scene.  Once again, I set every switch and button as both a controller and a responder.  Then I created a scene, specifically for my E…


I just finished reading The Agony and the Ecstasy by Irving Stone. It's a biographical novel of Michelangelo (you know, the famous sculptor/artist whose statue of David and the paintings in the Cistine Chapel are super famous) that gives a very interesting view of his life. It seems that while Michelangelo had a very productive life, it wasn't a very happy one.

One of the first things that I noticed about Stone's portrayel of Michelangelo is that he was obsessed with creating sculptures and a true perfectionist. For a large portion of his life (into his 60s it seems) his every action was calculated toward a goal of sculpting marble - either getting a commission or improving his talent (or both). Not only did he want to sculpt, he wanted his pieces to be as real as possible.

His obsession with carving perfect sculptures drove him to do endless studies of the human form. He even spent months sneaking into a morgue to dissect bodies so he could figure out how the body real…

Sonos Control with the Amazon Echo - How I did it

I've had my Amazon Echo for a year or so and one thing that I've wanted ever since I purchased it, is to be able to use voice commands to control my Sonos speakers.  I waited patiently (OK  not patiently) for Sonos skill to appear on the Echo but it still hasn't come.  I was encouraged when Sonos announced it was going to focus more on voice but still nothing.  Isn't there any way to control my Sonos with my Echo?

Yes - sort of.

WARNING: This post is not for the faint of heart because the solution is not trivial.

So, I found a project on github that uses another project on github combined with a custom skill on
the Echo via a web service hosted by AWS Lambda.  OK, that was the easy part.  I knew that going in.  That's why, initially, I waited.  There must be an elegant solution out there.  I searched and waited and searched again and waited again.  Finally I decided to give it a try.  If it worked it would be really cool.  If it didn't, well I'm no worse o…